The promise and perils of algae-based biofuels
Monday, December 28th, 2009

In a forthcoming article1 in Trends in Ecology and Evolution, Val Smith and colleagues describe why biofuels produced from algae have many benefits:
- The current production of biodiesel (~2 billion gallons in 2006) is far lower than annual consumption of diesel fuel (44 billion gallons per year). Simply put, biodiesel crops can’t keep pace with demand. We would have to grow significantly more biofuel crops, which would affect land use by reducing the acreage of food crops or natural habitats.
- Algae fats (lipids) can serve as the feedstocks for many types of fuels, including aviation fuel, which would be a major benefit because airline travel is a huge part of most people’s carbon footprints. Algae fuels are potentially carbon neutral. Making air travel carbon neutral would be a game changer.
- Algae grow extremely fast—much faster than terrestrial plants (which are made into biodiesel or ethanol). They lack anatomical parts like roots, flowers, and woody stems that don’t help plants photosynthesize (making them more productive than plants).
- One of the most amazing statistics in this paper is how much less land it would take to make algae based fuels compared to terrestrial plants because of the increased productivity of algae. To produce an amount of fuel equivalent to the global demand for oil, we would only need an area of land equivalent to 3-20% of current croplands. If we were to use biofuel plant crops instead, we would need about 2-8 times the amount of current global cropland. That’s so amazing I did a double take when I read it.
- Algae can be grown in tanks on lands that are marginally useful for crops so that we don’t have to sacrifice croplands.
- They can serve double-duty by removing excess nutrients from wastewater, thereby linking energy production and wastewater treatment.
- Algal production virtually eliminates the use of herbicides and insecticides and uses much less water than growing crops for fuels.
They also point out an interesting pitfall:
- Bioreactors containing algae are often unintentionally invaded by zooplankton that eat the algae. This can lead to predator-prey-type cycles in algae biomass, which is not good when you want to maximize algal biomass production.
- The solution? Add fish that eat the zooplankton. This would cause “top-down” pressure on the zooplankton, keeping their populations in check.
1Smith, V. et al (in press) The ecology of algal biodiesel production. Trends in Ecology and Evolution.
_____
Photo credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/sandialabs/ / CC BY-NC-SA 2.0
to get control of climate change, we have to stop thinking about recycling CO2 in a carbon neutral thinking and get to carbon and energy negative programs. Carbon and energy negative programs can be developed by using pyrolysis on our massive ever-expanding messes of organic wastes and sewage solids, if renewable energy is used, Renewable fuel can be gotten from the 50% of carbon in those wastes that gete expelled as a crude oil like mix from the pyrolysis chamber. The other 50% of the biocarbon gets converted to inert charcoal that can be used asw a soil amendment.
All the biofuels programs recycle carbon dioxide without removing any CO2 or heat energy from their overloads already in the biosphere causing all kinds of damage already. The programs for biofuels should be dropped and money doled out to them put into pyrolysis of those messes of already in hand biomass going to WASTE. NO problems with usurping land and water to grow biomass for fuels occur with that biomass. Dr. J. Singmaster
Is there anyone testing the safety of emissions from burning algae?
See these articles about the phony eco-friendliness of burning ethanol:
http://www.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/E85PaperEST0207.pdf
http://news.stanford.edu/news/2009/december14/ozone-ethanol-health-121409.html
just askin’!
There are many people developing open source algae reactors and processing info on the web. Check out algaegeek.com as a great example. http://algaegeek.com