Guilford Harbor

“The University’s Crisis of Purpose”

Wednesday, October 21st, 2009

Harvard University President, Drew Gilpin Faust, argues in the NY Times that higher education, in order to deal with global challenges like climate warming, needs to return to its liberal arts principles rather than producing countless numbers of business majors.

Some excerpts:

The world economic crisis and the election of Barack Obama will change the future of higher education. Even as universities, both public and private, face unanticipated financial constraints, the president has called on them to assist in solving problems from health care delivery to climate change to economic recovery….

As the world indulged in a bubble of false prosperity and excessive materialism, should universities — in their research, teaching and writing — have made greater efforts to expose the patterns of risk and denial? Should universities have presented a firmer counterweight to economic irresponsibility? Have universities become too captive to the immediate and worldly purposes they serve? Has the market model become the fundamental and defining identity of higher education?

As a nation, we need to ask more than this from our universities. Higher learning can offer individuals and societies a depth and breadth of vision absent from the inevitably myopic present. Human beings need meaning, understanding and perspective as well as jobs. The question should not be whether we can afford to believe in such purposes in these times, but whether we can afford not to.

Others have argued similarly in the Times recently (Is it Time to Retrain B-Schools? and End the University as We Know It.)

Are these isolated rumblings, or is there a more fundamental problem, first identified by Wendell Berry and David Orr years ago, that the way we train students and structure higher education contributes to the major environmental and social problems we now face?

What does it mean to train students to be successful in a world that is ecologically unsustainable and socially unjust?

5 Responses to ““The University’s Crisis of Purpose””

|
  1. Kim Smith says:

    I’m all for reexamining how and what we teach, but I wonder if critiques like this distract us from more pressing issues, like keeping higher ed affordable and accessible. The innovative teaching we want to encourage in the universities is generally very expensive and time-consuming. Maybe we’re making the access issue worse.

    I also wonder if the way we teach environmental studies and sciences doesn’t sometimes exacerbate the narrow, disciplinary mentality, by focusing attention on “problem-solving.” Problem-solving is a great way to get students applying what they’ve learned–and we know that helps with the learning process. But it also usually an important step: critically examining the construction of the problem itself. This critical perspective is a central aim of a liberal education.

  2. [...] I mentioned in an earlier post, it’s time for higher education to start thinking about what it means to train people to be [...]

  3. [...] Although she doesn’t mention teaching, I’d argue that this kind of interdisciplinary transformation, focusing on major contemporary problems and the balancing of pure and applied inquiry, also needs to happen on the curricular side of campus. [...]

  4. [...] that is needed to conceive of and deal with global change problems.  As we have seen in previous posts, it’s time for higher education to consider adding problem-centered approaches to the general [...]

|

Leave a Reply

Bowdoin College

Bowdoin College web site:

Search | A - Z Index | Directory